When Scarlett Mitchell moved into her East Boston condo 12 years ago, her 9-year-old daughter made her promise that it would be their last move. They had been “going from place, to place, to place,” Mitchell said.Though she was working three jobs, when she looked for an apartment she was told she didn’t make enough money to cover the rent. Owning a home? Out of the question. Mitchell says at that point in her life, “I was homeless. I literally didn’t have a place to live.”Her story is not uncommon.Amid a growing population, Greater Boston is facing a housing crisis that is hitting lower-income and working-class residents particularly hard. According to a new WBUR poll, many say the cost of housing is perhaps the single most pressing issue facing the region.To help combat the problem, Harvard University is recommitting $20 million to an initiative aimed at increasing the amount of affordable housing in Greater Boston. Through the Harvard Local Housing Collaborative, the University has partnered with three local, nonprofit community-development lenders to create and preserve affordable housing, build and revitalize healthy communities, and create economic opportunities for low- and middle-income residents throughout the region.The partners include Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC), BlueHub Capital (formerly Boston Community Capital), and the Cambridge Affordable Housing Trust.Mitchell, who moved to the U.S. from Venezuela 31 years ago and now works as a preschool teacher in the Boston Public Schools, was able to get into her condo with assistance from the East Boston Neighborhood of Affordable Housing (NOAH) nonprofit and behind-the-scenes support of LISC and BlueHub.,“Someone at my church told me about NOAH. With their help, I was finally able to qualify. I went through the process, I won the housing lottery … I became the very first homeowner in the [Falcon-Border] complex,” she said. “I’ve been here 12 years now. I’m very happy. My children finished high school. My daughter is in college now. I got my bachelor’s degree, and I’m working on my master’s. I have all that I was looking for. I’m so appreciative and grateful for everyone who made this possible for me. I have a have a home, a place to call my own.“I wish there were more affordable housing complexes like this. There are so many people who are just like I was,” Mitchell continued, “people who are trying so hard to look for a place to live, but they just can’t afford the rent anymore.”Though the housing problem has grown more acute in recent years, Harvard launched its program, formerly known as 20/20/2000, in 2000, initially committing $20 million in low-interest, flexible loans. Since then, the fund has revolved more than two times, and has helped finance the preservation and creation of more than 7,000 units of affordable housing locally.The crucial recommitment ensures that the funding continues for at least the next two decades.“Harvard is pleased to renew the Harvard Local Housing Collaborative. We are proud to be part of a community where partners from across Greater Boston come together to strengthen the region and address the urgent need for quality, affordable housing,” said Harvard President Larry Bacow. “We are grateful to all of our partners for their support and their efforts to increase access to homeownership and promote fair and equitable access to housing.”,The program’s impact can be felt throughout the region. It has helped leverage more than $1.3 billion in housing developments with more than 5,500 affordable units in Boston and more than 1,600 affordable units in Cambridge. The program has also helped finance additional housing developments in Somerville and Watertown.The financing that is provided through the Harvard Local Housing Collaborative is flexible, low-cost, and available at the critical early stages of development — such as during land acquisition and predevelopment — making it a particularly attractive, and oftentimes crucial, element for developers.“Harvard has been a supportive housing partner to LISC for two decades, and we are thrilled to renew our partnership through the Harvard Local Housing Collaborative. It takes a civic partner who is invested in our communities to make flexible funds available at low cost on a long-term basis to drive housing affordability. Our region’s income disparity and housing affordability challenges have grown to crisis levels since our partnership began in 1999. We need the engagement and investment of anchor institutions like Harvard to take our response to this crisis to another level,” said Karen Kelleher, executive director of LISC Boston.Projects throughout the region include affordable apartments, cooperative housing, assisted living for low-income seniors, opportunities for first-time home-buyers, artist’s lofts, and even shelters. Many are adjacent to public transportation and include easy access to public green space.Leaders in both Cambridge and Boston have continued to make affordable housing creation a priority.Cambridge is grappling with how to expand opportunities for affordable-housing development in all neighborhoods in a way that ensures a diverse and vibrant city. The City Council is mulling over an idea for a new zoning law, with the goal of helping housing developers create new affordable units more quickly, more cost-effectively, and in areas where there are fewer affordable housing options for residents.Whether or not the city’s proposal moves forward, Harvard’s housing fund, with its access to early capital, has been a critical driver in helping Cambridge and its nonprofit developers address the crisis.“The University is an exceptional partner in our public education, sustainability, and affordable-housing efforts,” said Cambridge City Manager Louis A. DePasquale. “Harvard’s affordable-housing initiative has directly impacted thousands of residents throughout our city.”Boston has set a goal of creating 69,000 affordable units by the year 2030.“Creating more quality, affordable housing for a range of incomes is essential to preserving the diversity that makes Boston the incredible city that it is, and is the backbone of Mayor [Martin J.] Walsh’s housing policy. Twenty years ago, Harvard stepped up to create this fund, providing early investment in the development process that has been a crucial element in many successful affordable developments,” said Sheila Dillon, the chief of housing and director of neighborhood development for the city of Boston. “Harvard’s continued partnership and investment in affordable housing in Boston has not only been innovative but is also a wonderful example of how a private organization can have a meaningful impact on the lives of thousands of Bostonians.”“Harvard’s program, providing access to capital, is an important partnership to allow affordable-housing creators to be competitive in the development market, and then build or preserve much-needed affordable housing options,” said Rep. Kevin G. Honan, chair of Massachusetts’ Joint Committee on Housing. “It’s an innovative program that’s making a tangible difference in neighborhoods across our city, and throughout the region. I’m pleased to learn that this transformative program will continue for another 20 years.”Harvard’s recommitment follows the launch of an initiative last week by Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both Harvard teaching hospitals, together with Boston Medical Center, designed to help local families pay their rent. The three hospitals, acknowledging the strong connection between stable housing and good health, pledged to spend approximately $3 million over three years to fund housing programs designed to prevent displacement, eviction, and homelessness.Besides bolstering the health of individuals, housing stability contributes to strengthening communities and combating a range of social and economic problems.“I feel like I belong here,” said Mitchell. “I belong to this community. This is my home. My building. It’s perfect for me. I’m so blessed.” The Daily Gazette Sign up for daily emails to get the latest Harvard news.
“In ‘rare and extreme circumstances,’ the court may ‘dismiss criminal charges as a sanction for government misconduct,’” the memorandum stated. The memorandum referenced an Oct. 2 note from Singer’s iPhone released last month in which he stated that he intentionally misled parents to believe their payments would fund legitimate university activities. In the note, Singer wrote that federal prosecutors directed him to testify that the parents knew the money would be used to bribe University officials. The document alleged that the defendants had asked the government whether the note was investigated but that the government did not respond. The defendants stated that the government’s failure to look into potential misconduct from prosecutors proved the government has been prioritizing its case against the parents over presenting accurate information to the court for the trial. “The Government has an affirmative duty to ensure that the evidence it relies on is accurate,” the memorandum read. “Here, that means the prosecutors should have investigated Singer’s allegations — immediately after learning about them — to ensure the evidence generated by his calls was accurate and untainted by coercion.” “They continue to ask me to tell a fib and not restate what I told my clients as to where there money was going — to the program not the coach and that it was a donation and they want it to be a payment,” the note read. Thirteen parents in the college admissions scandal, including 10 from USC, filed a motion Wednesday requesting the court dismiss charges against them on the grounds that it misrepresented evidence used to prosecute the defendants and withheld evidence that would have benefited the defense. The memorandum also stated that the delayed release of evidence relevant to the parents’ defense further strengthened their case for dismissing the charges. The original deadline to release information was May 30, 2019, and the federal government turned over Singer’s iPhone note Feb. 26. In the court documents, the defendants asked that recordings of phone conversations between Singer and the parents not be used in court if the charges are not dismissed and the trials proceed. They argued the evidence is unusable because of the government’s misconduct in obtaining the recordings and its failure to turn over relevant evidence to the defense in a timely manner. The parents asserted that in cases of corrupted evidence, the court could throw out documents from consideration. They also cited a precedent that defendants could be acquitted if a judge found federal prosecutors guilty of gross wrongdoing in the process of gathering evidence. Eleven of the 15 parents who pleaded not guilty and will stand trial beginning this fall have ties to USC. Trials for the first group of parents who opted to contest charges are set to commence Oct. 5, with jury selection beginning Sept. 28. The coronavirus outbreak will not affect trial dates, federal judge Nathaniel Gorton stated in an order filed last week. In the memorandum supporting the motion, the defendants alleged that the government pushed scheme organizer William “Rick” Singer to lie under oath about whether the parents involved in his “side door” operation knew the money they paid for their children’s admissions to universities as false athletic recruits would be given to individual officials rather than used to fund university programs. The memorandum to support the motion stated that the government’s failure to turn over evidence to the defense on time, in combination with its alleged coercion of scandal mastermind William “Rick” Singer, render the evidence unusable in court. (Daily Trojan file photo)